A growing omnichannel 3PL was handling 300 to 500 weekend parcel orders before Monday processing began.
Once those parcels entered the conveyor workflow, the slowdown became clear. The conveyor moved parcels forward, but manual dimensioning slowed the process around it. Each parcel still had to be scanned, measured, and prepared before consolidation and shipment.
The issue was not just weekend volume. It was the manual dimensioning step that made parcels wait before they could move forward.
Where Did the Monday Slowdown Start?
The slowdown started at the measurement step.
Operators had to stop the parcel, capture its dimensions, enter the values, and then move it back into the conveyor flow. On regular days, this process looked manageable. But after a weekend order buildup, the same step started holding parcels back.
The old workflow created four clear problems:
- Parcels waited longer at the conveyor
- Measurements varied by operator
- Manual entry slowed system updates
- Peak-day backlogs took longer to clear
The 3PL needed to remove that manual pause before weekend volume became a repeat problem.
Why Did the Existing Workflow Stop Working?
The old method depended too much on operators to repeat the same task quickly and accurately.
That created two problems. The first was speed. Manual measurement added a few extra seconds to every parcel. Across hundreds of parcels, those seconds turned into a backlog.
The second was data consistency. When operators measured parcels and entered values by hand, the final record changed based on the parcel type, the operator, and the pace of the shift.
For a 3PL handling ecommerce shipments across multiple transporters, that process was hard to scale.
What Changed in the Conveyor Workflow?
The 3PL placed vMeasure automated parcel dimensioning at the beginning of the conveyor line.
That changed how measurement worked in the process.
Instead of making operators handle dimensioning as a separate task, vMeasure captured parcel dimensions as soon as each parcel entered the workflow. The captured data then moved into the internal system without another manual entry step.
The system also synced data between cloud storage and local servers, so the operation had access to shipment records without depending on disconnected files.
What Looked Different After Automation?
Before automation, measurement interrupted parcel flow.
After automation, measurement became part of the conveyor process.
That created a 66% reduction in parcel processing time while removing the manual entry step from the workflow.
| Before | After |
|---|---|
|
Parcels paused for manual measurement |
Parcels were measured at conveyor entry |
|
Operators entered dimension values by hand |
Data moved into connected systems |
|
Monday queues built up during weekend order spikes |
Processing stayed more consistent |
|
Manual measurement varied by operator |
Dimension capture became standardized |
The 3PL did not just process parcels faster. It used the conveyor workflow more effectively because parcels no longer had to pause for manual measurement before moving forward.
Why Did This Matter for the 3PL?
The 3PL made the change before weekend volume became harder to manage.
That decision made the conveyor workflow more prepared for peak days, higher parcel movement, and cleaner shipment records.
The real issue was not just volume. Manual measurement was slowing each parcel before it moved forward.
If manual measurement is slowing parcel movement in your workflow, switch to automated parcel dimensioning before small delays turn into daily backlogs.
Talk to the dimensioning experts
Explore how automated parcel dimensioning could fit into your workflow.
Discuss a similar setup for your parcel operation.
What do our customers say?
"…They are now indispensable components in our shipping process and have allowed us to predict shipping costs accurately…"
Bargain Book Stores
"...vMeasure provided excellent support throughout the product integration process, with readily available and effective after-sales assistance…"
Holisol
"...With vMeasure, we were able to take the cloud-based solution literally under a day and under a far more achievable budget..."
Pidge